Clin Osteol 2005; 10(4): 101-105

Ibandronate - the new bisphosphonate in the treatment of osteoporosis; its position among other bisphosphonates results of clinical trialsNews

V. Vyskočil

In the introduction the author discusses complications of osteoporotic fractures showing that mortality rate of 50-year-old women due to breast cancer is as high as mortality rate due to hip fracture. Osteoporosis, especially in women, is number one cause of hospitalization in the European Union coun­ tries. Very important part of treatment efficacy similar to other chronic conditions is the patient's adherence to the treatment. A crucial contributor to the adherence is an optimum dosage and possibility to extend dosage interval. Ibandronate is a third generation bisphosphonate tested in many trials. A randomized double blind BONE trial in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis suggested that 3 year daily ibandronate 2.5 mg administration resulted in an increase of lumbar spine BMD by 6.5 % and proximal femur BMD by 3.4 %, while in the group with intermittent dosage corresponding BMD increased by 5.7 % and 2.9 %, respectively. BMD in both groups when compared to the control group (1.3 % and -0.7 %, respectively) was signifi­ cantly higher (all p < 0.0001). Relative risk of a new vertebral fracture was reduced by 62 % (daily dosage) and 50 % (intermittent dosage), which is the highest reduction among all bisphosphonates used in osteoporosis treatment. Risk reduction of nonverterbral fractures by 69 % (p = 0.0122) was de­ monstrated in a group of patients with T-score <-3 SD. Ibandronate was therefore the first oral bisphosponate, which demonstrated efficacy even with dosage interval extended beyond one week. Subsequent MOBILE trial investigated the optimum dosage of oral ibandronate in once per month admi­ nistration. Primary outcome of BMD increase was met in all three tested monthly dosages and dosage 150 mg monthly in comparison with dosage 2.5mg daily yielded significantly higher increase of BMD in lumbar spine: 4.9 % vs. 3.9 % with significance level p < 0.001. Ibandronate is one of the bisphosphonates that also has intravenous form. DIVA trial evaluated if intravenous ibandronate 2 mg once every 2 months or 3 mg once every 3 months has efficacy comparable to daily oral dosage 2.5 mg, whose efficacy has been already established in the osteoporosis treat­ ment. Both intravenous dosing regimes after the first year of treatment resulted in significantly (p < 0.001) higher increase of BMD of lumbar spine and proximal femur compared to daily dosage (2 mg/bimonthly: 5.1 % and 2.8 %, respectively; 3 mg/quarterly: 4.8 % and 2.4 %, respectively; 2.5 mg daily: 3.8 % and 1.8 %, respectively). All regimes were comparable one to another regarding CTX suppression and also with other bisphosphonates. Ibandronate has efficacy at least comparable to other aminobisphosphonates and it has an excellent general safety. Extending dosage interval may improve patient's adherence to the treatment and hence also therapeutical results.

Keywords: morbidity, mortality, adher

Published: December 11, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vyskočil V. Ibandronate - the new bisphosphonate in the treatment of osteoporosis; its position among other bisphosphonates results of clinical trials. Osteologický bulletin. 2005;10(4):101-105.
Download citation

References

  1. Consensus Development Conference, JAMA 2001;285:785-95.
  2. Cummings Black DM, Rubin SM. Lifetime risks of hip, Colles', or vertebral fr ture and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2445 48. Go to original source...
  3. International Osteoporosis Foundation 2000. Annual Report. http://www.osteofound.org/iof/pdf/report_2000.pdf
  4. Looker A, Orwoll E, Johnston CJ, et al. Prevalence of low femoral bo in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1761-68. Go to original source...
  5. Ira P, Scott DL, O'Neill TW, et al.: Quality low trauma hip in men. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;Aug 3.
  6. Lippuner K, von Overbeck J, Iferrelet R, et al. Incidence and Direct Medical Co of Hospitalizations due to Osteoporotic Fractures in Switzerland. Osteopor Int 2001;7:414-25. Go to original source...
  7. Tosteson A, Grove MR, Hammond CS, et al. Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med 2003;115:209-16. Go to original source...
  8. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J. Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 2004;48: 271-87. Go to original source...
  9. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, et al. The impact of compliance with osteopo­ rosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int. 2004;1 Go to original source...
  10. Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, Altman R. Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteo­ porosis. Cur Med Res and Opin 2005;21:1453-60. Go to original source...
  11. P^papoulos SE. Bisphosphonates: Structure-activity relations from a clinical p spective. Medicina (B Aires) 1997;57(Suppl.1): 61-64.
  12. Bell R. Efficacy of ibandronate in metastatic bone disease: Review of clinical data. The Oncologist 2005;10(Suppl. 1):8-13. Go to original source...
  13. Jackson GH. Renal safety of ibandronate. The Oncologist 2005;10(Suppl. 1):14-18. Go to original source...
  14. Fleisch H. Bisphosphonates in Bone Diseases. Third Edition. New Y henon Publishing Group, 1997:32-38,39-57,58-63,69-85,112-116,117-144.
  15. Schmidt A, Rutledge SJ, Endo N. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase aktivity regula osteoclast formation and function: inhibition by alendronate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:3068-73. Go to original source...
  16. SmPC Bonviva EU/1/03/265/003.
  17. Recker RR, Weinstein RS, Chesnut CH, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of daily and intermittent oral ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteopo­ rosis: results from the BONE study. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:231-7. Go to original source...
  18. Bauss F, Russell RG. Ibandronate in osteoporosis: p for intermittent dosing. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:423-33. Go to original source...
  19. Ravn P, Clemmesen B, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. The effect on bone mass and markers of different doses of ibandronate: a new bisphosphonate for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a 1-year, randomized, double­ blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding study. Bone 1996;19:527-33. Go to original source...
  20. Chesnut CH., Skag A, Christiansen C., Recker R. Effects of Oral Ibandronate ministered Daily or Intermittently on Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Osteopo­ rosis. J Bone Miner Res 2004;I9:I24I49. Go to original source...
  21. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: Results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 1998;280:2077-82. Go to original source...
  22. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, et al. Randomized trial of the effects of sedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal oste­ oporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) study group. Os­ teoporos Int 2000;11:83-91. Go to original source...
  23. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al. Randomized trial of effect of alend­ ronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 1996;348:1535-41. Go to original source...
  24. Reginster JY, Wilson KM, Dumont E, et al. Monthly oral ibandronate is well to­ lerated and efficacious in postmenopausal women: results from the monthly oral pilot study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:5018-24. Go to original source...
  25. Miller PD, McClung MR, Macovei L, et al. Monthly Oral Ibandromate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis 1-Year Results from the MOBILE Study. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:1315-22. Go to original source...
  26. Adami S, Delmas PD, Prince P, et al. Intermittent intravenous ibandronate tions and daily oral ibandronate provide similar decreases in bone resorption: 1-year results from DIVA Osteoporos Int 2005;16(Suppl. 3):86 (Abstract P323).




Clinical Osteology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.