Clin Osteol 2018; 23(3): 94-99

Comparison of patient mortality after proximal femoral fracture in the periods 1995-2002 and 2003-2010Original contributions

Ševčík Tomáš1, Tomková Soňa2, Lorinczová Zuzana2
1 Klinika muskuloskeletárnej a športovej medicíny LF UPJŠ a Nemocnica Košice-Šaca a. s., 1. súkromná nemocnica, Košice, Slovensko
2 Interná klinika LF UPJŠ a Nemocnica Košice-Šaca a. s., 1. súkromná nemocnica, Košice, Slovensko

The aim of the study:
Monitoring of the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur and the mortality of patients after these fractures at individual time intervals within one year of the accident in the period of 2003-2010 and comparison of the results with those from 1995-2002.

Material and methods:
Retrospective study, data collection from the ORDINiS hospital database and E-health database. Patients hospitalized in the orthopedic surgery department with the proximal femoral osteoporotic fracture between 2003-2010, with patients aged up to 50 years, patients with pathological fractures and those with insufficient data in the system being excluded from the study. 4 mortality periods assessed: within 10 days following surgery, 10-90 days and 90-365 days following surgery, and an annual cumulative mortality rate.

Results:
The mortality rate within ten days after surgery in our set was 9.09% for males and 4.18% for females. For the second period between 10-90 days, the mortality rate was 12.12% among males and 13.95% among females. Mortality from the 90th day to the completed year after the accident reached 13.13 % for males and 13.48 % for females. Annual cumulative mortality reached 32.34% for males and 28.62% for females, i.e. the cumulative annual mortality rate for both sexes equalled 0.3%.

Conclusion:
Despite the effort to reduce early mortality after a proximal femoral fracture, the progress is very slow and approximately 30% of the patients die within a year's time after the accident.

Keywords: mortality; osteoporosis; proximal femoral fracture

Received: November 7, 2018; Accepted: October 2, 2018; Published: December 11, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ševčík T, Tomková S, Lorinczová Z. Comparison of patient mortality after proximal femoral fracture in the periods 1995-2002 and 2003-2010. Clinical Osteology. 2018;23(3):94-99.
Download citation

References

  1. Meessen JM, Pisani S, Gambino ML et al. Assessment of mortality risk in elderly patients after proximal femoral fracture. Orhopedics 2014; 37(2): e194-200. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.3928/01477447-20140124-25>. Go to original source...
  2. Guerra ETM, Viana DR, Feil L et al. One-year mortality of elderly patients with hip fracture surgically treated at a hospital in Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52(1): 17-23. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2016.11.006>. Go to original source...
  3. Nyholm AM, Gromov K, Palm H et al. Time to Surgery Is Associated with Thirty-Day and Ninety-Day Mortality After Proximal Femoral Fracture: A Retrospective Observational Study on Prospectively Collected Data from the Danish Fracture Database Collaborators. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97(16): 1333-1339. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.2106/JBJS.O.00029>. Go to original source...
  4. Chien-FU Lin J, Liang MW. Mortality, readmission, and reoperation after hip fracture in nonagenarians. BMC Musculoskelet Disprd 2017; 18 : 144. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1493-5>. Go to original source...
  5. Mundi S, Pindiprolu B, Simunovic N et al. Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over past 31 years. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(1): 54-59. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.878831>. Go to original source...
  6. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM et al. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 2009; 302(14): 1573-1579. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1462>. Go to original source...
  7. Lewiecki E, Wright NC et al. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29(3): 717-722. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0>. Go to original source...
  8. Cirera E, Pérez K, Santamariña-Rubio E et al. Improvements in hip fracture incidence counterbalanced by the rise of other fracture types: data from Spain 2000-2010. Injury 2014; 45(12): 2076-2083. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.016>. Go to original source...
  9. Tomková S, Varga M, Šašala M. Mortalita pacientov po zlomenine proximálneho konca stehnovej kosti. Osteologický Bulletin 2009 : 14(1): 3-6.




Clinical Osteology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.